|
|
Maximizing Carrier Profitability &
Efficiency

Measuring
Success - OSS Reconciliation Activities
Mere days following implementation of the BDS Solution, a number
of equipment and circuit data mismatches begin to be recognized
between the virtual representation of the Carrier's network and
the actual network configuration ('As-Built'). First, equipment
and circuit data is corrected in the Provisioning/Inventory Management
System (i.e.: MetaSolv, Granite, TIRKS), which begins to improve
the accuracy and usefulness of the OSS data. However, these errors
also have downstream ramifications that produce real money - or
'hard dollars'.
There are a number of tangible and less tangible ('soft dollar')
benefits associated with having the OSS match the true network.
However, the significant hard dollar contributions that reduce
costs and/or increase revenue fall into six reconciliation categories:
-
Spares
& Excess Equipment: as the crews (via polling and/or site
visits) inventory the network locations, spare cards and excess
material is identified that is not visible centrally. Here
too over carded shelves are noted. Instead of purchasing new
material to meet existing demand, this equipment can be used
to turn up new service, redeployed to higher demand areas,
sold and/or written off.
-
Stranded
Capacity & Related $MRR: commonly, high demand buildings/areas
are targeted early in the process in order to locate stranded
capacity that could be used to fill held orders and get revenue
in the door quicker. We define stranded capacity as equipment
and circuit paths (cabling/connectivity) that could be used
to turn-up new service and generate revenue. Stranded capacity
is often the result of an incomplete disconnect process.
-
Stranded
Equipment: two of the major contributors to OSS data not
matching the 'As-Built' include the broken feedback loop between
Operations and Engineering, and incomplete disconnects. Disconnects
often stop at turning down service and frequently valuable
equipment is left behind and/or not placed into inventory.
Overbuilding of capacity can also cause this phenomenon. The
result - new equipment is continually purchased unnecessarily,
wasting time and money.
-
Billing:
during reconciliation, circuit exceptions are matched against
the applicable billing system(s). Although the method for
tying inventory to billing varies by client environment, detailed
information is produced that can be used to identify customers
receiving service who may have never made it to billing. In
addition, customers with improper billing charges and billing
cycles are also recognized.
-
Offnet/COGS:
here, the physical and logical inventory points to leased
circuits that have been disconnected with the LEC, but continue
to be paid by the Carrier's COGS (leased line accounting)
organization. The Carrier then has the detailed data necessary
to stop paying for disconnected Offnet (off network) lines,
while also recovering overpayments from the LEC.
-
Fixed
Assets: construction work in process (CWIP) network locations
and the associated equipment becomes fixed assets (from an
Accounting perspective) following activation of service. Commonly,
this equipment status change is not communicated back to the
Accounting group - resulting in an inaccurate fixed asset
picture, inexact depreciation schedules and erroneous tax
payments. An inaccurate fixed asset record can contribute
substantial errors to all major corporate financial statements
including the Balance Sheet, Statement of Operations, and
Statement of Cash Flow. And now with the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the accuracy of corporate financial records
is more important than ever.
The above reconciliation activities do not always apply to all
reconciliation projects - some Carriers may choose to forgo fixed
asset reconciliation in favor of getting their Provisioning System
in order. Others may choose to focus on Provisioning and Billing,
but wait on COGS reconciliation until a later date. No matter
what the project scope may be, significant ROI benefits are delivered
in each of the six reconciliation categories.
|
|